Jefferson and Washington monuments

“This is great. We’ll take it.”

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

My wife is not real picky. That is fortunate for me. Otherwise, she might never have decided to marry me. We were visiting different neighborhoods in Baltimore this past weekend in advance of a possible move there next summer, and we happened to run into a woman on the street who turned out to be realtor. The woman was the …

D.C. skyline

Harrison v. U.S.: Reasonable Doubt Through Too Many “Interconnected Inferences”

Jamison KoehlerLegal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

Yes, they record your personal phone calls from prison. Yes, they have someone listen to those tapes. And, yes, they sometimes find something on those tapes to use against you. There is usually a voice recording that periodically reminds both parties — the inmate and the family member or friend he is speaking with – that the conversation is being …

U.S. Capitol building

Sonia Sotomayor On Being A Lawyer

Jamison KoehlerLaw Practice

Q:  Would you describe yourself as being tough on the bench? A:  Demanding. Q:  You’re demanding. A:  Tough, yes, in the sense that I want lawyers to be prepared.  I think that being a lawyer is one of the best jobs in the whole wide world. Q:  Really? A:  You want to know why?  Because every lawyer, no matter whom …

Jefferson Memorial

The Difference Between Direct and Circumstantial Evidence in D.C.

Jamison KoehlerEvidence

Someone was asking me the other day about the difference between direct evidence and circumstantial evidence. The D.C. Criminal Jury Instructions provide a very helpful explanation: There are two types of evidence from which you can determine what the facts are in this case – direct evidence and circumstantial evidence. When a witness, such as an eyewitness, asserts actual knowledge …

U.S. Capitol building

Michigan v. Long Is Ripe for Reversal

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Opinions/Cases

Courts seem to be bending over backwards to avoid basing decisions on Arizona v. Gant. In an opinion issued last month by the D.C. Court of Appeals, for example, the defendant was pulled over for a minor traffic offense. The defendant was ordered out of the van and frisked, with the officer finding no weapons. The officer then handcuffed the defendant …

U.S. Capitol building

The ABA Journal’s Most-Voted-For Criminal Justice Blog for 2012

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Law Bloggers

This blog again received the most popular votes in the criminal justice category of the ABA Blawg 100. Thank you very much to everyone who nominated and/or voted for it. Here are the blogs that received the most votes in each category: Business of Law: Divorce Discourse Careers/Law Schools: Inside the Law School Scam Corporate: California Corporate & Securities Law …

U.S. Capitol building

Mindy Daniels, My Reluctant Mentor

Jamison KoehlerAppellate Practice, D.C. Superior Court

She doesn’t know it yet but Mindy Daniels is going to be my mentor on all things having to do with the D.C. Court of Appeals. One of the first things I do whenever I start out in a new jurisdiction is to decide which lawyers I admire most. I then glom onto them. I usually pick a handful of …

D.C. skyline

Applying To Take The Maryland Out-of-State Lawyers Bar Exam

Jamison KoehlerLaw Practice

The last time I sat for a bar exam – in Virginia in 2010, after taking the Pennsylvania exam in 2006 – I swore to myself that I would never, ever do it again. Filling out the application for the character evaluation was bad enough. Learning umpteen new subjects in which I had no interest and then sitting for two …

U.S. Capitol building

Why I Prefer D.C.

Jamison KoehlerD.C. Superior Court, Law Practice

Here are 15 reasons I prefer D.C. Superior Court to the Criminal Justice Center in Philadelphia: There is a cafeteria. There is a lawyer’s lounge. There is a legal library. Women in orange jackets greet you when you come into the building and direct you to where you need to go. You can get into an elevator. When you can’t …

U.S. Capitol Building

“No Questions, Your Honor”

Jamison KoehlerTrial Advocacy

If practice makes perfect, then prosecutors tend to be better at direct examination and defense attorneys at cross. It is a question of what we do the most of. I think of this while watching a prosecutor conduct a cross-examination in JM-13. The defendant has taken the stand in her own defense, and the prosecutor is trying to poke holes …

U.S. Capitol building

Attempted Battery Assault in D.C. is a “Specific Intent” Offense

Jamison KoehlerAssault, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

In law school and in preparing for the Bar Exam, we were taught the distinction between general intent and specific intent crimes. If it is a general intent offense, the government must prove only that the defendant intended to take the physical action that resulted in the harm; that is, that the defendant’s actions were not the result of a …

Emma brush soccer

All Emma, In Everything

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

I am standing with my niece in front of my father’s bureau, and I show her the gold-plated watch with the “Hamilton” typed out across its face.  My father loved pocket watches and there are a couple of them still sitting on his bureau so it takes me a moment to find the right one.  The watch I select is …

U.S. Capitol Building

Interpreting “Joint Constructive Possession” in Tamara Smith v. U.S.

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

If constructive possession is a legal fiction, then joint constructive possession is a double legal fiction. It is not only that you do not actually possess the article in question (and by actual possession, I mean physical occupancy or control over the property). It is that other people – it could be one person, it could be four other people …

Jefferson and Washington monuments

Confronting the Complainant Before Trial

Jamison KoehlerInvestigations

If you want to get a complainant to speak with you before trial, ask the complainant about his or her injury. People love to talk about how they have been wronged. The floodgate opens. My investigator Wayne and I approach an interview with the complainant as if we are preparing for the Superbowl. After all, in some cases, you only …

U.S. Capitol Building

What is a “Testimonial Statement” under Crawford v. Washington?

Jamison KoehlerEvidence, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

You know you are in trouble the moment the judge refers to “that Supreme Court case on confrontation.”  He adds: “Robinson I think it is called.” The judge is a highly respected senior judge.   Although you realize he doesn’t do many criminal cases, you are still somewhat taken aback by his comment. Robinson?  Are you kidding me? Standing there with …

“My Lawyer Told Me Not To Talk To Anyone About This Case”

Jamison KoehlerJuveniles

One of the reasons I accept court appointments in juvenile cases – but not adult cases – is that the juveniles generally listen to you.  Even then, you can’t always take that for granted. It was thus very gratifying to read the following exchange described in a psychiatric evaluation for a juvenile client. When the evaluator asked my client about …

Jefferson Memorial

On “Constructive Venting” And Wayne My Investigator

Jamison KoehlerD.C. Superior Court, Investigations, Law Practice

Seth Godin writes about a friend of his, a middle school teacher, who avoided the teacher’s lounge because “he couldn’t bear the badmouthing of students, the whining and the blaming”: Just about every organization, every on-line service, every product and every element of our culture now has chat rooms and forums devoted to a few people looking for something to …

Jefferson Memorial

“Call My Accuser Before My Face . . .”

Jamison KoehlerEvidence

The Proof of the Common Law is by witness and jury:  let Cobham he here, let him speak it.  Call my accuser before my face . . . — Sir Walter Raleigh It is always difficult to predict how a witness will perform under the “crucible of cross-examination.” A far safer bet is to bring in the same testimony through …

Aerial view of DC

I Feel The Pain of Everything. Then I Feel Nothing.

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

He was the angry and alienated younger brother of my best friend while I was growing up. My mother sent me newspaper clippings about him when he was a member of a grunge rock band of local renown. She didn’t need to send me anything when he became nationally and then internationally known:  Spin magazine put him on its cover …

D.C. skyline

Lazo v. U.S.: A Court’s Duty To Investigate a Jencks Act Violation

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Evidence, Opinions/Cases

The Jencks Act was a nasty little surprise when I began to practice in D.C. It was not that I didn’t appreciate getting the information. It was that I was used to getting this information much earlier in the process in Pennsylvania. The Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C § 3500, requires the prosecution to turn over to the defense any “statement” of a witness …

U.S. Capitol Building

Mason v. U.S.: When Is A Prior Consistent Statement Admissible?

Jamison KoehlerEvidence, Opinions/Cases

I love appellate cases on evidentiary issues – which the D.C. Court of Appeals seems to be doing a lot lately — because they allow me to take out my handy-dandy McCormick on Evidence guide. According to McCormick, there are three things you need to know about the credibility of a witness:  bolstering, impeachment, and rehabilitation. Impeachment and rehabilitation are straight-forward. …

U.S. Capitol building

Longus v. U.S.: On Bias, Extrinsic Evidence, and the Collateral Fact Rule

Jamison KoehlerEvidence, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

Bias is “the powerful distorting effect on human testimony of the witness’s emotions or feelings towards the parties or the witness’ self-interest in the outcome of the case.”  That is McCormick on Evidence, and it is the clearest, most accurate definition I have ever seen of what constitutes bias. McCormick continues: “[B]ias, or any acts, relationships, or motives reasonably likely to produce …

U.S. Capitol Building

Why Prosecutors Love Social Media

Jamison KoehlerSocial Media and Technology

This, from Prosecutor’s Discretion, says it much more persuasively than I ever could: Facebook, Twitter, Myspace (anyone use that anymore?), google+.  I’m on record by saying I love them all. People need to brag about their crimes and what better way than in writing on Facebook. They love to threaten witnesses. They connect with a group of friends, which makes it easier to show …

Eleven Rules for Effective Writing (aka “How to Write Good”)

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

Here are 11 rules for effective writing, with thanks to Kendall Gray of The Appellate Recordfor reminding me of them: Avoid alliteration. Always. Prepositions are not words to end sentences with. Avoid clichés like the plague.  (They’re old hat.) Eschew ampersands and abbreviations, etc. One should never generalize. Comparisons are as bad as clichés. Be more or less specific. Sentence …

Firing Andrew Crespo

Jamison KoehlerD.C. Superior Court, Trial Advocacy

I am watching what has to be the best cross-examination at a probable cause hearing I have ever seen. It is a new attorney from the Public Defender Service (PDS), someone I have never seen before, and he is handling the cross-examination like he is Irving Younger. He is pleasant but firm. He moves methodically through the facts, pinning the …

D.C. skyline

New Lawsuit Alleging Military Rape Filed in Federal Court

Jamison KoehlerAssault, Current Events

The Associated Press reported on the lawsuit filed yesterday in federal court in San Francisco alleging that current and former members of the U.S. military were sexually assaulted while serving: The 20 women and men filing the lawsuit claim they were harassed, raped or assaulted and suffered retaliation when they reported the incidents. The lawsuit names top Department of Defense …

D.C. v. Loftus: Operating On A Suspended License Is A Strict Liability Offense

Jamison KoehlerDUI and Driving Offenses, Opinions/Cases

Driving without a license has long been a strict liability offense in D.C. That is, in order to secure a conviction for this offense, the government need only prove that you didn’t have a driver’s license at the time you were driving. It does not need to prove any type of criminal intent or guilty knowledge; in this case, that …

D.C. skyline

Acta Exteriora Indicant Interiora Secreta

Jamison KoehlerLegal Concepts/Principles

Today’s legal maxim is not particularly eloquent, in either Latin (acta exteriora indicant interiora secreta) or English (“outward acts indicate the thoughts hidden within”). But I include it today because it deals with intent, which is a key concept in criminal law. Men rea (or “state of mind”) is an element of most criminal offenses. And since the finder of …

Achilles Now. Poseidon Too.

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

He was the best octopus hunter in Tolo. It was always an honor whenever he sent one of us boys out to the kiosk to buy him cigarettes:  Karelia ke spirta, parakalo. It was an even bigger honor if he invited you along to hunt for octopus. He did the diving. You stayed on the surface, holding onto the octopi he …

U.S. Capitol building

Meet the Girlfriend

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

My older son brought his girlfriend home to meet the parents. Actually, he came home from college to take care of some personal business and he brought the woman he is seeing along with him. But it has the same practical effect of something potentially more meaningful. My wife picked them up last night at the train station after I …

Jefferson Memorial

Defining “Readily Available” in Clyburn v. U.S.

Jamison KoehlerFirearms/Weapons, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

You can be sitting at work and “constructively possess” something tucked away in your bedroom closet at home. It is not whether you actually physically possess the piece of property at the time; it is whether you have the “power and intent” to control it.  And you are presumed to both know about and have the power to control the …

Jefferson and Washington monuments

A Guilty Plea at D.C. Superior Court

Jamison KoehlerD.C. Superior Court, Juveniles

Guest Post by Emma Brush A visit to Arlington was the occasion for this undeserved opportunity of mine to post.  Originally, my Uncle Jamie had a jury trial scheduled. Knowing that I was considering law school, he thought it would be fun for me to see. Unfortunately, the court date was postponed.  Fortunately, he had a juvenile case that was …

Jefferson and Washington monuments

The Ethical Obligations of a Prosecutor

Jamison KoehlerProfessional Responsibility/Ethics

According to Rule 3.8 of the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, a prosecutor in a criminal case shall not: “[i]ntentionally fail to disclose to the defense, upon request and at a time when use by the defense is reasonably feasible, any evidence or information that the prosecutor knows or reasonably should know tends to negate the guilt of the accused …

Once Again, No Consequences for Prosecutorial Misconduct

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

On the morning of trial, the prosecutor finds out that the testimony provided by a police officer at the preliminary hearing was inaccurate. Although the prosecutor himself is not planning to call this particular police officer to testify at trial, he knows that the defense attorney is. So what does prosecutor do?  Does he immediately contact the defense attorney to …

U.S. Capitol building

Actus Me Invito Factus Non Est Meus Actus

Jamison KoehlerLegal Concepts/Principles

After a guest post by my brother turned out to be one of the most popular pages on this site, I had hoped that the classics scholar was going to be a regular contributor on this site. Alas, my no good brother has turned out to be a complete slacker with better ways to spend his time. So I am …

Jefferson and Washington monuments

A “Not Guilty” Letdown

Jamison KoehlerTrial Advocacy

I walk my client out to the street afterward (“You mean I don’t have to sign anything, I can just go?”), disappointed that, since it is late in the day, there is no one still at the courthouse to share the news with. First I get my wife’s voice mail. Then I get my investigator’s. Walking over to the parking …

U.S. Capitol building

Goodbye to Dana Tapper and the PDS Summer Interns

Jamison KoehlerJuveniles

Summer is over, and the Public Defender Service (PDS) interns assigned to the Youth Services Center are gone. Although I never met any of them in person (they were there during the day, and I visit clients evenings and over the weekend), I will miss them very much. So will my clients. The interns were young and smart and had …

U.S. Capitol building

Enforcing Brady v. Maryland: Toward An “Open File” Discovery Requirement

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

A constitutional right without any way of enforcing that constitutional right is hardly any right at all.  That’s a pretty accurate description of the government’s obligations under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution and Brady v. Maryland to turn over exculpatory information to the defense. Relying almost entirely on the goodwill and integrity of the individual prosecutor assigned …

U.S. Capitol building

Leaving the Drama — and Surprises — for Closing Argument

Jamison KoehlerTrial Advocacy

Your client is cranky with you for the lousy job he thinks you are doing on cross-examination. There are no dramatic “gotcha” moments like you see on T.V. Instead, every time you elicit what appears to be an inconsistency in the witness’ testimony, you pull back, moving onto a new line of questioning. It is almost as if you didn’t …

Same Standard, Different Penalties for Drinking-and-Driving in DC

Jamison KoehlerDUI and Driving Offenses, Opinions/Cases

D.C. Superior Court judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys have traditionally treated the criminal offense of Operating While Impaired (OWI) as if it were a lesser-included offense of Driving Under The Influence (DUI).  Although a specific standard for OWI cannot be found in either the statute or case law, judges have repeatedly stated that in order to secure a conviction for …

D.C. skyline

Interpreting Arizona v. Gant’s “Reasonable Belief” Standard for Warrantless Car Searches

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Opinions/Cases

In Arizona v. Gant, the U.S. Supreme Court helped slow a continuing trend in the chipping away of Fourth Amendment protections. For years, most jurisdictions allowed police officers to search any car whose occupants had been arrested, even when the traditional justifications for the warrantless car search –officer safety and preservation of evidence – were absent.  Typical of the resulting practice …

In Re D.M.: When Can You Dismiss a Juvenile Case for “Social Reasons”?

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Juveniles, Opinions/Cases

The problem with using a canon of statutory interpretation to justify a legal opinion is that you can usually find some other canon to arrive at the exact opposite conclusion. For example, to support its recent holding in In Re D.M., 47 A.3d 539 (D.C. 2012), the D.C. Court of Appeals used the rule that, whenever possible, different provisions within a …

Aerial view of DC

Met and Unmet Client Expectations

Jamison KoehlerLaw Practice

Over at Tempe Criminal Defense, Matt Brown has been talking about expectations – client expectations and his own.  “The angry client rant is tough,” Brown says. And the problem, he says, starts with expectations. Clients expect the system to treat them fairly.  They blame their lawyers when it doesn’t: I would like to think that my threshold for having people …

Aerial view of DC

What Is “Unprovoked Flight” Under Illinois v. Wardlow?

Jamison KoehlerLegal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

Flight hasn’t always been such a terrible thing. At one time, courts seemed to recognize that there might be all sorts of reasons an innocent person might want to distance himself from the presence of a police officer. Not all contacts with police officers are Norman Rockwell positive, particularly for certain members of our society. And, absent a reasonable suspicion …

U.S. Capitol Building

Bickering Over Basic Facts on Cross-Examination

Jamison KoehlerEvidence, Trial Advocacy

I like the government witnesses who fight with you on cross-examination, refusing to acknowledge even the most basic facts, like whether a particular street goes north-south or east-west.  It is as though any concession at all to the defense will lose the case for the government. Although I have never been a judge or sat on a jury, I would …

U.S. Capitol building

Why I Like D.C.’s Public Defender Service

Jamison KoehlerD.C. Superior Court, Law Practice

When I worked as a public defender in Philadelphia, we had what I can only describe as an uneasy relationship with the private criminal defense bar.  Looking at it from the standpoint of the PD’s office, there were a number of reasons for this somewhat dysfunctional relationship. For one thing, some of the private defense attorneys were just plain bad, …

American flag

Ramifications of a Juvenile Adjudication in D.C.

Jamison KoehlerJuveniles

One of the questions parents of a juvenile client often ask me is the effect of a juvenile adjudication on their child’s future. The question often comes up in the context of plea negotiations. If, for example, the government has offered to reduce the charge from robbery to simple assault or theft, the parents want to know if and how …

U.S. Capitol building

Open Letter to an Honest Cop

Jamison KoehlerD.C. Superior Court, Professional Responsibility/Ethics

Dear Officer Parrish: A couple of weeks ago, I cross-examined one of your colleagues from the 3rd District.  The issue at that hearing was similar to the one under consideration today:  Whether or not the arresting officer had reasonable suspicion or probable cause to detain my client. Your colleague decided to strengthen the government’s case against my client by lying.  …

Jefferson Memorial

In Re S.W.: Context is Critical When Proving Criminal Threat

Jamison KoehlerOpinions/Cases, Other Criminal Offenses

I have never been a fan of D.C.’s “threats to do bodily harm” statute. For one thing, it criminalizes behavior that is already covered under the assault statute.  After all, is there any real difference between threatening to hurt another person and intending to frighten someone?  For another, with almost identical language in both the felony and misdemeanor threats statutes, …

Jefferson Memorial

From Tide to Tide in Cape Cod

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

We have been coming to Cape Cod with my extended family now for 25 years.  We came first as couples. Then we came with children. With the 13 cousins growing up and the rest of us just getting old, it is unclear how many more years we will cross the Sagamore Bridge to make this trip.  Like a game of …

Jefferson Memorial

In Re W.R.: Warrantless Search During a Custodial Arrest

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

Jejomar Untalan has been busy.  I reported last week on his successful appeal in In re S.B.  This week the D.C. Court of Appeals issued yet another decision bearing Untalan’s name as the appellant’s attorney:  In re W.R.,  52 A.3d 820 (D.C. 2012).  This time, however, Untalan was unsuccessful. W.R. was approached during the school day by a police officer …

Jefferson Memorial

California v. Hodari D: A Criminal Defense Lawyer’s Complaint

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

California v. Hodari D, 499 U.S. 621 (1991), is a lousy opinion. It used to be that a person was seized for Fourth Amendment purposes the moment his or her liberty was “restrained” by “some physical force or show of authority” by a police officer. This was the standard established by Terry v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court case that lays …

U.S. Capitol Building

On Mid-Life Career Changes: What I Did Before I Became A Lawyer

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

Ten years ago this month, I walked out of the Ronald Reagan Building carrying a single cardboard box. Having just resigned from the federal government, the box contained all I had to show after an 18-year career:  a coffee mug, photographs, some personal papers, and the plaque they had just given me at a going-away party. The last thing I …

U.S. Capitol Building

Cold Feet on the Morning of Trial

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

It must be pretty intimidating to arrive at the courthouse for trial to find five police officers, an eyewitness, and a complaining witness all sitting in the hallway, laughing and joking with each other and then growing silent as you pass by – all of them there for the sole purpose of testifying against you, their bond a common interest …

U.S. Capitol building

Thorne v. U.S.: You Can’t Penalize the Defendant for Exercising His Constitutional Rights

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

It is a challenge for every criminal defense attorney. You want to do everything you can to put the government’s case to the test. At the same time, recognizing that you still might not win, you don’t want to antagonize the judge such that the judge decides to penalize your client at sentencing. Because, after all, you need to take …

Cue the Radiotape

Jamison KoehlerDiscovery, Evidence, Social Media and Technology, Trial Advocacy

I am a middle-aged man with some life experience. I have been doing criminal defense for a while now. Just yesterday I posted how many police officers “editorialize” when testifying. Still, I continue to be surprised – each time anew – every time a police officer gets up on the stand and lies. I should have seen the signs. There …

U.S. Capitol Building

“Don’t Editorialize”

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Humor, Trial Advocacy

Many police officers have a tendency to editorialize on the witness stand. It is not that the driver reached for the glove compartment after being pulled over so that he could have his license and registration ready for the officer’s inspection. It is that the “suspect” was making “furtive movements” upon the officer’s approach. It is not that the police …

U.S. Capitol Building

Trial Transcript: A Brand New Prosecutor on Direct

Jamison KoehlerEvidence, Humor, Trial Advocacy

POLICE OFFICER:  . . . The defendants knew they were not allowed in the store. DEFENSE ATTORNEY:  Objection. THE COURT:  Grounds? DEFENSE ATTORNEY:  Your Honor, as to what the defendants knew, I’d object to that and move to strike. PROSECUTOR:  Your Honor – THE COURT:  Calls – PROSECUTOR:  — I think he was saying the defendants – THE COURT:  — …

D.C. skyline

Aborted Guilty Pleas and Superhuman Judges

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Opinions/Cases

The disciplined judicial mind should not be subjected to any unnecessary strain;…the most austere intellect has a subconscious. How great is this language? Although the language dates back to 1972, it did not come to my attention until it was quoted in a opinion issued this month by the D.C. Court of Appeals, Plummer v. United States, ___A.3d ___, ___ …

Jefferson Memorial

Groundhog Day at the CVS

Jamison KoehlerEvidence, Social Media and Technology

It is a snippet of life from a CVS store in the District, viewed again and again through 15 different surveillance cameras. There is a 5-minute view from one camera – say, for example, at the entrance of the store. When that 5 minutes is up, you go back in time like the Bill Murray character in Groundhog Day to …

Amusing Trial Transcripts

Jamison KoehlerHumor

Back when I was a public defender, my office mate used to come across me reading transcripts from court hearings I had done – from either a trial or a preliminary hearing – and kid me.  I thought I was being conscientious, working hard to make myself a better lawyer.  He thought I was being vain. Apparently he hadn’t read …

Jefferson and Washington monuments

Gilding the Lily on Cross-Examination

Jamison KoehlerTrial Advocacy

After you get what you need on cross-examination, you sit down. The charge is unlawful entry. Both defendants had been issued a barring notice from the Meadowbrook Run Apartments, and the government alleges that the defendants violated this notice by entering an apartment at Meadowbrook Run. During cross-examination, Attorney A gets the police officer to testify that he saw the …

Trial Notebook as Security Blanket

Jamison KoehlerLaw Practice, Trial Advocacy

I recently served as co-counsel in two juvenile cases with Eddie Ferrer of D.C. Lawyers for Youth.  Although neither case ended up going to trial, you do get a pretty good sense of your colleagues when working together to represent co-defendants. I am always happy when co-counseling with lawyers from the D.C. Public Defender Service — most recently Michael Carter, …

U.S. Capitol Building

Dawkins v. United States: How Far Must A Party Go To Preserve Issue For Appeal?

Jamison KoehlerLegal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

In an opinion issued last week, Dawkins v. United States, 41 A.3d 1265 (D.C. 2012), the D.C. Court of Appeals addressed the issue of how far a party must go in order to preserve an issue for appeal.  The Court also confirmed the long-standing principle that the potential bias of a witness is always relevant in assessing a witness’ credibility. …

Joseph Rakofsky’s Former Client Sentenced to 10 Years

Jamison KoehlerCurrent Events, D.C. Superior Court, Professional Responsibility/Ethics

After pleading guilty to involuntary manslaughter, Dontrell Deaner has been sentenced to 10 years in prison, to be followed by 5 years of supervised probation. Remember Dontrell Deaner? Just over a year ago, his name was all over the Internet in connection with the Joseph Rakofsky fiasco. Rakofsky was the lawyer, a few years out of law school, who took …

D.C. skyline

Do Your Job, Mr. Prosecutor. And Turn Over the Evidence.

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Current Events, Professional Responsibility/Ethics

The prosecutor has acknowledged that he should have turned over certain information to defense attorneys. That is what he says today. The case was back in 1984. Witnesses came forward when he was still preparing the case to say that there were two other men in the alley that night who were never charged.  One of these men, identified by …

U.S. Capitol Building

The ABCs of “Character Evidence” in a D.C. Criminal Case

Jamison KoehlerEvidence, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

Over 65 years ago, Justice Robert H. Jackson, writing for the U.S. Supreme Court in Michelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469 (1948), complained about the “helpful but illogical options” available to a defendant attempting to introduce evidence of his good character in a criminal trial:  “We concur in the general opinion of courts, textwriters and the profession,” Jackson wrote, …

Aerial view of DC

The Ties Will Last You Forever

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

My wife complains about all the closet space I take up with my neckties. I do have lots of them. You see, I have this theory about ties, a theory that was finally confirmed by the guy who sells me my clothes. If you keep wearing the same tie, the tie will refuse to lie flat after a couple of …

Jefferson Memorial

Morgan v. U.S.: Inconsistent Evidence at Trial and “Show Cause” Hearing

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

One of the things that surprised me when I first began to practice criminal law was the notion that you could be acquitted of a particular offense at trial and then have that very same criminal charge – the one on which you were just found not guilty – serve as the basis for being found in violation of probation …

D.C. skyline

Ignition Interlock To Be Required For All DUI-Restricted Licenses in Virginia

Jamison KoehlerCurrent Events, DUI and Driving Offenses

Beginning July 1, 2012, every person who is convicted of a drinking-and-driving offense in Virginia and who wants to drive on a restricted license will be required to install an ignition interlock device on his/her car.  Current law applies this requirement only to repeat offenders and to first-time offenders who are convicted of a blood alcohol level of 0.15 or …

Jefferson Memorial

Simms v. U.S.: On the Pre-Trial Presumption of Prosecutorial Vindictiveness

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles, Opinions/Cases

David Simms was charged with possession of marijuana. On the day of his scheduled trial, the government announced that it was ready to proceed on the charge. Defense counsel stated it was still awaiting discovery on a few matters and, after passing the matter a couple of times, the court eventually postponed the trial so that the discovery issues could …

U.S. Capitol building

Total Quality Management and the Practice of Criminal Law

Jamison KoehlerLaw Practice

Nobody talks about Total Quality Management (TQM) anymore. An outdated fad from the 1980’s, and even then applied mostly within the automobile manufacturing industry, it may have questionable applicability to the practice of criminal law. But still I believe: You think ahead. You show up to meetings early. You return phone calls. You meet deadlines. You don’t make excuses. You …

American flag

Probation. Drugs. School. Then Home.

Jamison KoehlerJuveniles

I have a little speech I like to give to my juvenile clients. I tell them that, while I will be looking out for their legal interests as their lawyer, what happens to them pending trial or if found guilty of the offense will depend far more on what they do for themselves. I then hold up four fingers and …

Jefferson and Washington monuments

Open Guilty Plea = Bad Case + Fair Judge + Unreasonable Prosecutor

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Procedure, Legal Concepts/Principles

When faced with a really bad case, one option is to work out a favorable plea agreement with the government to try to mitigate consequences for the client. Another frequently overlooked option is to do an open guilty plea. In fact, the Criminal Practice Manual put out by the D.C. Public Defender Service devotes an entire chapter to guilty pleas …

Blawg Review #316: Where Are They Now?

Jamison KoehlerCriminal Law Bloggers

In the Blawg Review I hosted last year, “Images from the Criminal Law Blawgosphere,” I took a look at the photographs bloggers use on their sites. I was intrigued, for example, by how bloggers portray themselves to their readers. Do they go for the formal headshot? A more informal shot in casual clothes? Or do they provide no picture at …

Aerial view of DC

“Check Out The Shoes My Lawyer Is Wearing”

Jamison KoehlerLaw Practice

I used to buy my suits at Joseph Banks. When I started to put on weight, I switched to Brooks Brothers. Now I have my suits tailor made through J Peditto Apparel. But, until just a couple of years ago, I never gave a moment of thought to the shoes I wore. Linda Mullen, the woman who used to dress …

U.S. Capitol building

Cross Examinations. Directs, too.

Jamison KoehlerEvidence, Trial Advocacy

“No questions, Your Honor.” What could be more satisfying to say after your opponent has completed his direct examination than those four simple words? It is a challenge, a slap in the face with a folded glove.  It is a declaration that the other side hasn’t touched you, hasn’t hurt you at all, with the testimony. It is like Muhammad …

Managing Client Expectations

Jamison KoehlerLaw Practice

Indigent criminal defendants often have two simultaneous and potentially irreconcilable opinions of the lawyers who are appointed to represent them. On the one hand, they have absolutely no respect for the public defender or court-appointed lawyer. You aren’t a real lawyer, they say. You are working with the government.  It is easier for you if I just plead guilty.  And …

U.S. Capitol building

Wherever We Wish, Hydrangeas Could Be Blooming

Jamison KoehlerMiscellaneous

The “Family Tree” people from Belchertown have taken down most of the big trees in my parents’ yard.  My oldest sister – the one who helps my mother with her finances — hired them to do some trimming. They came back when my sister wasn’t there, again and again, each time getting my mother – always so cheerful, always so …

D.C. skyline

U.S. Out Of Afghanistan. Now.

Jamison KoehlerCurrent Events

We are not going to win. We are not going to stabilize the country. We are not going to win any hearts and minds. The only thing we will accomplish by remaining in this miserable, strife-ridden country is to lose more American lives. At some point, maybe, we had an opportunity of doing something positive in Afghanistan. With the full …