From the category archives:

Drug Offenses

Disorderly Conduct: D.C. Court Narrows The Scope

June 13, 2010 Drug Offenses

Disorderly conduct is a really annoying charge.
The first problem is that the offense is usually so broad and poorly defined that it is too easy for police to charge and too easy for the government to prove at trial.  For example, since intent to cause a “public inconvenience” is a major element of the offense [...]

Read the full article →

Use of An Expert Witness in a D.C. Drug or DWI/DUI Case

March 5, 2010 DUI and Driving Offenses

I used to hire a particular expert witness in Philadelphia on drug distribution cases, a guy named David Leff.  Leff was so good — that is, he had so much credibility with judges — that I rarely had to call him to the stand.   Sometimes all he needed to do was walk into the room [...]

Read the full article →

“Constructive Possession” in a D.C. Drug or Firearm/ Gun/Weapon Case

January 4, 2010 Drug Offenses

A defendant can in some cases be convicted of a criminal offense in Washington, D.C. for doing nothing more than possessing a particular object or substance.

According to D.C. law, for example, it is illegal to possess marijuana, heroin, cocaine and other substances that are controlled under the D.C. Controlled Substances Act.  Possession of other substances, [...]

Read the full article →

Drugs: Simple Possession

October 12, 2009 Drug Offenses

There are two basic drug offenses in the District of Columbia: (1) drug possession, and (2) drug dealing. Today’s entry will deal with the misdemeanor offense of drug possession.

The crime of drug possession requires: (1) knowing or intentional (2) possession of (3) controlled substance. The defendant can use the affirmative defense that the [...]

Read the full article →

Drugs: Judge or Jury Trial

October 11, 2009 Criminal Procedure

Sometimes, after the pre-trial motions have been litigated and any plea bargaining negotiations have been concluded, a defendant needs to have his or her day in court.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial for “all” criminal offenses. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted this requirement to apply only to “serious” criminal [...]

Read the full article →

Drugs: Admissibility of Statements

October 7, 2009 Criminal Procedure

Many people assume that if the police did not read the defendant his or her Miranda rights (“You have the right to remain silent,” etc.) during any phase of police investigation, the whole case will be thrown out. This is not true. In fact, any statements the defendant or any co-conspirators make would [...]

Read the full article →

Drugs: Search Warrants and Pedestrian/Car Stops

October 7, 2009 Criminal Procedure

One key to successfully defending drug cases is to keep out as much evidence as possible from the prosecution’s case at trial. Trials are basically a struggle between the two sides as to what evidence comes in and what evidence does not come in. That’s why the Rules of Evidence are so important [...]

Read the full article →

Penalties: Drug Distribution

October 6, 2009 Drug Offenses

The penalty in D.C. for a conviction for drug distribution or possession with intent to distribute depends on the type of drug involved. In earlier posts, I described how the D.C. Code groups controlled substances into five schedules depending on the drug’s potential for abuse and its level of acceptable medical uses in [...]

Read the full article →

Penalties: Simple Possession of Illegal Drugs

October 5, 2009 Drug Offenses

The maximum penalty for a first conviction of simple possession in the District of Columbia, regardless of the substance involved, is 180 days of incarceration, with a maximum fine of $1000. The maximum penalty for a second or subsequent conviction would be double that – a maximum of 360 days of incarceration and a [...]

Read the full article →

Drug Distribution

October 3, 2009 Drug Offenses

The second major drug offense in the District of Columbia is the felony charge of drug distribution or possession with intent to distribute (PWID) – what we generally refer to as “drug dealing.”
In order to secure a conviction for this offense, the prosecution must prove that the defendant (1) knowingly or intentionally (2) manufactured, distributed [...]

Read the full article →