Arson was traditionally defined as the “malicious burning of someone else’s dwelling house or outhouse that is either appurtenant to the dwelling house or within the curtilage.” In other words, the offense included the intentional burning not only of a person’s house but also any buildings or structures on the land adjoining the house.
Modern statutes generally define arson as the intentional and wrongful burning of either someone else’s property (as to destroy a building) or one’s own property (as to fraudulently collect insurance). Most of these statutes require that the offender either intended the actual harm or acted with “conscious disregard of a known and substantial risk of harm that the statute was intended to prevent.”
In order to secure a conviction for arson in D.C., the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt. D.C. Criminal Code § 22-301. First, the government must prove that the defendant burned or attempted to burn a building. This pertains to the “actus reus;” that is, the wrongful physical act that the law seeks to prevent. That the attempt to burn a building is written directly into the statute means that there can be no such thing as “attempted arson.”
Second, the government must prove that the building was the property of someone other than the defendant. (Setting fire to one’s own property is included under a separate offense in DC, “Burning One’s Own Property, With Intent to Defraud or Injure Another,” which is punishable by imprisonment of not more than 15 years. D.C. Criminal Code § 22-302.)
Third, the government must prove that the defendant set fire to the building voluntarily and on purpose, not by mistake or accident.
Fourth, addressing the defendant’s “mens rea” (or criminal intent), the government must prove that the defendant acted either: (1) with the intent to kill or seriously injure another person, (2) with the intent to threaten the security of anyone who occupied the property, or (3) in conscious disregard and substantial risk that his/her actions would endanger human life or threaten the security of anyone who occupied the property.
Finally, the government must prove that the defendant “acted without mitigation.” Mitigating circumstances would include the situation in which a person acts in the heat of passion brought about by adequate provocation.
The penalty for a conviction for arson is imprisonment from one to ten years. D.C. Criminal Code § 22-301.
Intentional burning or destruction of other forms of property are covered under D.C.’s Malicious Burning, Destruction, or Injury of Another’s Property” section. If the property in question is valued at $200 or more, the penalty is a maximum fine of $5,000 and not more than 10 years of imprisonment. If the property is worth less than $200, the defendant can be fined up to $1,000 and/or imprisoned for up to 180 days. D.C. Criminal Code § 22-303.