Misdemeanor assault · D.C. Superior Cour

Simple Assault in Washington, D.C.

Simple assault in Washington, D.C. is a misdemeanor under D.C. Code § 22-404 involving either the threat or use of force against another person, heard in D.C. Superior Court and punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a $1,000 fine. Any nonconsensual touching committed with force or violence can constitute an assault, and no touching at all is required for the intent-to-frighten form of the offense. Jamison Koehler defends simple assault charges in D.C. Superior Court; call today.
StatuteD.C. Code § 22-404
ClassificationMisdemeanor
Maximum jail180 days
Maximum fine$1,000
CourtD.C. Superior Court
Common defensesSelf-defense, defense of others, defense of property, lack of intent

What is simple assault in Washington, D.C.?

Simple assault in Washington, D.C. is a misdemeanor offense under D.C. Code § 22-404 involving either the threat or use of force against another person. Any type of nonconsensual touching, committed with force or violence, can constitute an assault.

There are three forms of misdemeanor, or simple, assault in Washington, D.C.: attempted-battery assault, intent-to-frighten assault, and misdemeanor sexual abuse.

In a simple assault case, "injury" is defined as any physical injury, however slight, and includes an "offensive touching."

Attempted-battery assault: the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant used force or violence either to injure someone or to try to injure someone, that the defendant intended to use force or violence against that other person, and that the defendant had the "apparent ability" to injure the person.
Intent-to-frighten assault: the government must prove that the defendant committed a threatening act that reasonably would create in another person a fear of immediate injury, that the defendant intended either to cause injury or to create fear, and that the defendant had the apparent ability to injure the other person.
Misdemeanor sexual abuse: the defendant engages in sexual contact with another person when the defendant should have known it was without that person's permission (D.C. Code § 22-3006).

What does the government have to prove about intent in a simple assault case?

In a D.C. simple assault case, the government must prove that the defendant intended to perform the physical act that constituted the touching. The touching cannot be "inadvertent."

The mental-state requirement for the offensiveness of a touch in a simple assault case may be satisfied by either purpose or knowledge.

Purpose: the conscious object to cause a particular result.
Knowledge: awareness that conduct will practically certainly cause a particular result.

Does simple assault in D.C. require touching someone?

No. Simple assault in D.C. does not require actual touching of the other person's body. Yelling at or threatening someone can be simple assault; the question is whether the offending actions put the person in reasonable fear of imminent bodily injury.

Spitting on someone can also be simple assault in D.C. Simple assault includes the nonconsensual touching of a person's body, and such touching does not necessarily require body-to-body contact.

Is simple assault in D.C. a domestic violence charge?

"Domestic violence" in D.C. is a general category of criminal conduct that can include a number of offenses, including simple assault, destruction of property, criminal threats, and unlawful entry.

Assuming the conduct involves two parties who are involved in some type of domestic relationship, meaning they are related or involved in a romantic relationship, a simple assault can be a subset of domestic violence.

What are the defenses to a simple assault charge in D.C.?

Self-defense, defense of others, and defense of property are all valid defenses to a simple assault charge in D.C., as is lack of intent.

A person is entitled to use a reasonable amount of force in self-defense if the person actually believes that he or she is in immediate danger of bodily harm and has reasonable grounds for that belief.

Results

What Jamison Koehler has achieved in these cases.

Acquittals in three separate simple assault cases, including a March 2026 not-guilty verdict after trial in D.C. Superior Court on a charge of threatening another person with a knife, where the complaining witness's account did not hold up.
Every case is different; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
What clients say

In their words.

Mr. Koehler is, as far as I am concerned, the best criminal defense lawyer in D.C. He walked me through things before I hired him, and literally everything he predicted came true. When I brought him on, it was clear that everyone in the courthouse respected him – judges, prosecutors, court clerks. At trial, he tied up the prosecutor with the rules of evidence, and he made the police officer look like a lying idiot. It was fun to watch. You almost felt bad for the officer. I was acquitted of all charges. I will be forever grateful to the man. Thank you, Mr. Koehler!
J.C., Simple Assault
I was falsely accused of a crime. I interviewed a number of lawyers before finding Mr. Koehler. Mr. Koehler was patient and kind with me. He didn't pressure me to hire him as others did. And he didn't seem to be all about the money. Everyone at the courthouse seemed to like and respect Mr. Koehler. He investigated the case thoroughly, and he did not pressure me to take a plea offer. He was calm at trial. And he exposed my accuser as the liar she was. We won!
V.E., Simple Assault/Destruction of Property
The testimonials are examples of what clients have posted about Jamison Koehler on legal referral sites. The outcome of a criminal case depends on factors unique to that case. By posting these testimonials, Koehler Law does not imply that it can achieve the same result in every case.
Did you know

What people get wrong about Simple Assault in Washington, D.C.

People think

The complaining witness’s word is enough to convict.

Actually

The government must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt. A Koehler Law client was acquitted in March 2026 when the complaining witness’s account did not hold up at trial.

People think

Spitting on someone isn’t assault.

Actually

It is. Nonconsensual touching does not require body-to-body contact.

People think

If nobody was hurt, there is no assault charge.

Actually

Injury means any physical injury, however slight, and includes an offensive touching.

People think

Unwanted sexual touching is always charged as a felony.

Actually

Misdemeanor sexual abuse, sexual contact the defendant should have known was without permission, is one of the three forms of simple assault in D.C. (D.C. Code § 22-3006).

People think

Words alone can never be assault.

Actually

Intent-to-frighten assault is committed by a threatening act that reasonably creates fear of immediate injury, with intent to injure or frighten and the apparent ability to do so.

    Questions people ask

    Frequently asked questions.

    Whether the charge rests on a touching, a threat, or a complaining witness's account, the government must prove every element of simple assault beyond a reasonable doubt. Call Jamison Koehler to talk through your case.